Macron Ordered The Assassination Of Candace Owens?

Ryan Matta posted the above video to X/Twitter on 22 November 2025.

In the tweet, he says:

"President Macron has paid for the assassination of Candace Owens. Yes, you heard that correctly. The President of France has placed a hit on the American journalist who exposed that his wife has a penis."

Ryan may be being a tad categoric here. He says what he says as though it's certain a French hit squad is on its way to murder Candace, which may not be true. For sure Candace believes it, she's not making it up, but it may not be true.

 
Brigitte Macron may also NOT have a penis. We may think Candace (and Ryan) are dead right about this but, until we actually get conclusive proof, nothing is certain.

 
Nevertheless, what Candace thinks may be in the works has certainly spooked her.

 
Here's what she said on 22 November 2025:

"Two days ago I was contacted by a high-ranking employee of the French Government. After determining this person’s position and proximity to the French couple, I have deemed the information they gave me to be credible enough to share publicly in the event that something happens.

In short, this person claims that the Macrons have executed upon and paid for my assassination. Yes, you read that correctly. More specifically, that the green light was given to a small team in National Gendamarie Intervention Group. I am told there is one Israeli that is on this assassination squad and the plans were formalized. Again, this person provided concrete proof that they are well placed within the French government apparatus.

Further to this point, this person claims that Charlie Kirk’s assassin trained with the French legion 13th brigade with multi-state involvement. Journalist Xavier Poussard’s life is also at risk. 

This is deadly serious. The head of state of France apparently wants us both dead and has authorized professional units to carry this out. I ask that every person RETWEET and share this.

I do not know who in the American government can be trusted, since this source claims our leaders are aware. But I have more specific information which is definitively verifiable, should they care to reach out to me. 

To the brave official in France who did this because they were so moved by the evil of Charlie’s public execution to risk their own life— May God bless you. Truly.

Let all be revealed."

All for telling the truth.

Or, at least, what Candace believes to be the truth.

What do I think? Well, if people are telling lies about you, the most obvious thing, which most people would do, is to provide proof that the people telling the lies are liars. You show them up. You show the whole world what kind of people they are by telling the truth yourself and, if necessary, providing evidence that what you are saying is correct and what they are saying is not.

You don't try and shut them up forever by killing them.

If I was Brigitte, I'd have invited Candace round for a private viewing. "Here you go, Candace, take a look! One hairy triangle with a pink sandwich in the middle. Satisfied?

And then, if I was Brigitte, I would have sued the a*** off the offending journalist.

As it happens, last time I looked, the Macrons WERE suing Candace. But that was a while ago now and that possibility seems to have hit the buffers. 

So, we're left with the above statement from Candace.

It'll be interesting to see what the Macrons have to say about it. The great and the good, likewise. I suspect that they'll play the "stark-raving-bonkers" card, call for the men in white suits and be seen to chortle uproariously. But, if there is anything to this, and folks come out of the woodwork with proof of ill intent towards Candace, the proverbial will, I reckon, hit the fan.

Curiouser and curiouser.

That's the world we live in, folks. That's the world THEY made for us.

I, for one, will not be thanking them.

More commentary from Ryan Matta on Candace, the threat from Frog 1 and the Trump administration's silence/inaction - 22 November 2025!

23 November 2025 update from Ryan...

More from Ryan...

The Rich And Powerful Elites? We're Putting Them Last!

On 19 November 2025, Ryan Matta introduced this video to X/Twitter.

It features Marjorie Taylor Greene's speech to Congress the day before.

RYAN: "Where's the next road block gonna be? How many of us are actually banking on the fact that we're actually, one day, gonna see the Epstein files?... I'm not holding my breath... Are we finally gonna take down the Deep State?... How dark is this? How dark do you think they're gonna let it get? And how much in these files do you think we're actually gonna see?"

MARJORIE: "Earlier today, I attended the press conference where the survivors, they're not victims, the survivors of Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse and sex trafficking told their stories. And they told stories about how it started back in 1991, 1996, and they continued on through the decades. And they told stories about how they told someone and tried to get help. They told the FBI and they weren't listened to. And they told law enforcement and no one did anything. And these women don't just number a few. These women number around 1,000 women. And they are victims of something that's unthinkable.

And this should have never ever have happened. This was the biggest fight I think I've seen in Washington DC. This is my fifth year here. And this was a fight that we should have never had to wage. It should have been the easiest thing for every single member of Congress. It should have been the easiest thing for the speaker of the house. It should have been the easiest thing for the President of the United States to release all the information, every single file on behalf of these American women.

These American women aren't rich, powerful elites. They do not have someone paying for their airline tickets or paying for their trips or paying for their expenses every time they try to do something to get this get this information out. These are your average Americans. And you want to know what the Epstein files represent? The cover up represents to average Americans. It represents the failures of the federal government and Congress to the American people. And that is that is what people rose up about in 2024.

They wanted and demanded transparency from their government and for Americans finally to be put first. And today with this vote, we are finally putting these victims and these survivors of Jeffrey Epstein and the cabal of rich powerful elites that expands not just here in the United States of America, but to other countries as well. We're putting them last. And that is exactly what Americans want. You see, for far too long, far too long, Americans have been put last. And they're sick of it. They're sick and tired of it. And this is why they don't trust Congress. This is why they don't trust the government...

Will the Department of Justice release all the information? Will a judge in New York release the information? Will the CIA release the information? And will foreign governments release their information? Or will this continue, after this vote today, to be a cover up? A cover up of the rich powerful elites that bond together in sex and human trafficking abuse and all types of global business that enriches them but never serves Americans."

Well done, Marjorie. 

Well done to Thomas Massie and all of those who forced the hand of the establishment.

The Few are strong and unspeakably corrupt. The many are  not.

Who will be victorious?

How many decent folks will have the courage to stand up when it matters?

There's your answer. 

 

When Tucker Realised He Was Being Used To Push Gulf War 2!

On 19 November 2025, Tucker Carlson said this Bryan Dawson's '1819' show:

"I happen to remember the moment that everything changed for me was it was in the winter of 2003 and... someone I really liked was killed in Iraq and, the first day actually at Baghdad airport, I was a reporter covering it and so I felt an obligation to go see it. So I went and I spent some time there and what I saw bore no resemblance to what I expected at all. It was chaos... We created that chaos.

And so I knew right away that this was bad and it would not end well... That's it. It was not a particularly deep insight, but it was very strong... I just expected, you know, the US government runs this. Like my family works for the government. Like we're part of the government. We live in Washington, we're part of this whole thing... I advocated for this war. I had one of the highest rated shows on TV at the time in 2003. And I so I felt implicated by the whole thing... I carried water for Bush as he sold this war under false pretenses. So I definitely felt like responsible a little bit...

So, I'm flying back, I'll never forget this... and a friend of mine from the New York Times calls and says something like, 'what did you think of Iraq?' And I tell him and he writes this story in which I say, 'This is a disaster and I can't believe I supported this.' 

So, I'm sitting on the plane flying from somewhere in Europe back to Washington and I get a text from a guy called John Podhoretz, (John Mordecai Podhoretz is the son of top Neocons, Norman Podhoretz and Midge Decter. Editor of the political magazine 'Commentary' [Jewish orientation] since 2009, a post previously held by his father for over 30 years. Before that, Podhoretz ran the editorial page of the 'New York Post,' and was the deputy editor of 'The Weekly Standard', both of which are owned by Rupert Murdoch) who's now the editor of 'Commentary,' and he was my old editor.

I'd worked under him... and I never thought much of him at all. However, I did think we were involved in roughly the same project, which was, like, finding out what's true and then saying it out loud. And he sent me this text, or maybe email, that was like, 'I hate you. I can't believe you've gone over the other side. You're a bad person!' Attacking me personally... He hadn't been to Iraq, right? It had just started. He had not been there. I had and I was just saying what I thought, which is like, 'holy smokes, this is bad.' And he attacked me.

And I remember thinking, you know, I don't care what John Podhoretz thinks. Of course, I never have cared what John Podhoretz thinks, but I remember thinking, all this guy cares about is, like, some agenda that he won't say out loud. And anyone who gets in the way of that agenda, even if they're telling the truth, must be destroyed.

I remember thinking, boy, we are not in the same business at all... I'm not saying that I'm, like, a better person than him. All I'm saying is he had a different objective. And I started to look back on the things the stories that I had written at the behest of my editors at the Weekly Standard and other publications. And I began to realize that I had been used... They, basically, used that to take out some of their enemies and to push an agenda that they never bothered to describe to me. And that agenda was, of course, to serve the interest of Israel...

I don't work for the Israeli government. I don't want to work for the Israeli government. And if you're like using me to help the Israeli government, you should at least tell me. But they weren't. They were lying... They used me. And they always disliked me. I could always feel that... I remember thinking these guys are really kind of sinister. And I've been mad about it ever since. And I'm still mad when I think about it...

Mad, of course, not even primarily at them, but at myself for participating in this and not knowing what it was and not taking the time to figure out what it was. And and then, of course, I'm mad above all... for taking positions that are the opposite of the ones I have today...

In Washington... no one is willing to admit fault for anything. And because no one is ever punished for doing evil or lying, we keep getting farther and farther off course. So the Iraq war, clear disaster. People of good faith, including me, supported it. We were wrong. Because they won't admit that, by and large, we're off to some other war! Yeah. Under the same false pretenses, serving the same master, which is not America at all. It's the Israeli government...

I am opposed to making the same mistake again. Doing the Iraq war again. That's my bottom line concern. That's what this whole current argument is about. I said, 'no, I don't think we should have a regime change war with Iran.' Not because I love Iran. I'm a Christian, not a Shiite. But because I don't think the last time was good for America...

So they don't want to have a conversation. They refused to have a conversation about the actual aim, which is using the US military to overthrow someone else's government on behalf of another country. They don't want to have that conversation because nobody supports that. So, instead, they immediately call you a bigot because no decent person supports anti-semitism. So when they call you an anti-semite, people are like, 'well, I may agree with him on X, Y, and Z, but I'm opposed to anti-semitism.' So, it's a way of avoiding the argument and then winning a separate unrelated argument...

I've seen it so many times, including with Pat Buchanan. I participated in it with Pat Buchanan to my great shame. I apologised to his face many times. He became my friend.

I'm not doing this for any other reason other than I think it's true."

Thank you, Tucker, for all the truths you tell and the mistakes, apologetically, before the whole world, you dare to correct.

In this 3 minute clip, Tucker doubles down: “Supporting Israel isn’t Christianity. It’s a theological scam... There is no 'Chosen People', the chosen people are people who choose Jesus!”

The System Is Working To Hide Its Own Failings!

Winston Marshall interviewed Telegraph journalist, Alison Pearson, on 15 November 2025.

Alison said:

"So, Nikki as I call her is an asylum case worker. There are about six and a half thousand of those distributed over 19 centers around the UK... This year alone 39,000 young mainly young undocumented males have come across the channel in small boats. So I went to meet Nikki expecting to hear that things were not great, but she said, 'You're going to be very shocked.' And I was very, very shocked, absolutely shattered to be honest.

And one of the first things she (Nikki, an asylum case worker) said to me was, "I keep thinking that one day I'm going to turn on the TV. It's inevitable that I will see a man I've granted asylum to who has or murdered a girl like one of my girls. Nikki has three daughters... Nikki thinks there are hundreds of thousands. 

The official numbers were given are just the tip of the iceberg. He was wandering around Eping asking school girls to make babies with him. Nikki said they got a memo saying the police and terrorist checks would be suspended. There are sex offenders on the loose who've been granted asylum. So that's her motive in wanting to speak out about what's happening...

I guess perhaps the most shocking thing was that she has to grant asylum to men who have they know have been exposing themselves in children's play areas uh in Britain. Men who have been stalking girls, uh men who are on the sex offenders register, men who could be up on a rape charge and they would still uh be uh considered for asylum. And the reason for that is that the law as it stands at the moment is that unless someone seeking asylum has been sentenced to 12 months in jail, uh they're still considered for asylum.

And what Nikki was explaining is that they when you have an applicant, she said they've got to call them customers now, which gives you a bit of a clue as to um the attitude. So the customers who are these young undocumented males who've destroyed their papers and broken into our country, she will do a police check and an international terrorist check. And the police check will come up and it will say Mr. X exposed himself in a playground. But because, say, that guy is from Afghanistan, Eritrea, Sudan or Kuwait, those are four countries where effectively they're not allowed to deny asylum to anyone from there... This absolutely infuriates me...

Now the Home Office, when my Telegraph piece was published, we put it to them and they they denied that there was such a thing as automatic asylum to people from certain countries. We know that isn't true. And we also know that if you claim to be a Syrian from 2021 to 2023, 99% of Syrians claiming asylum have been granted asylum. So that's effectively, if you say you're from particular country and, obviously, as Nikki pointed out, most African males are now saying they're Eritrean...

Obviously not all the people across the Channel are going to be rapists or and terrorists. A proportion of them are right. So we don't need them in our country. We don't need to run that risk. That risk should be foremost in the minds of the state. This government exists to protect the public, right? But it's absolutely warped to prioritize the fact that these men will be in danger possibly if they're returned to their country of origin. 

That's not our problem. Our problem is a 14-year-old girl in Epping walking to school coming face to face with this Ethiopian guy who who says he wants to make babies with her and then the lady walking past who comes to intervene then she's assaulted as well. Why should that woman and girl be exposed to that risk? Why? Where are their human rights?... They can't go and shout and site article and three. It's just a racket...

There's a whole immigration law firms that are built on constant vexacious claims to keep these guys in the country, right? They should be shut down.. Who is speaking up for the women and girls?..

We have to leave the ECR. We have to repeal the Human Rights Act here. Any of the legislation that the immigration lawyers can use to string out the cases for their clients. Anyone who enters our country illegally. So...4 essentially, anyone who's broken into our country is moved removed immediately to a detention center and then they'll be taken to an aeroplane and then they will be deposited somewhere to be decided. I don't know, we must have got some islands in the South Atlantic. 

It's just it's got to be drastic because it is an absolute crisis. And what I find so strange since speaking to Nikki is I just expect to see this every day on the news. Why isn't it on the news every day? Why are we not afraid of what's being done every single day?

Last Thursday, Friday, Saturday, 2,000 men across the Atlantic, young men of fighting age. What are we doing? Where are they going to go? What's going to happen to the women in the communities where they're dumped?

One of the most extraordinary things when my piece was published and we put the various claims to the Home Office was they didn't deny that sex offenders and men who'd been guilty of gross and indecent behavior, they didn't say that doesn't happen because they know it does happen. 

So, I guess was one of many strong feelings I have is absolute incredulity that the system is designed to protect foreign males who've broken into our country and to hell with the safety of women and children...

We have had in Epping where Hades Kabatu got off a boat and eight days later, with new clothes given to him by Britain, with a nice hotel to stay in given to him by Britain, with £50 pocket money given to him by Britain, he was wandering around Epping asking school girls to make babies with him... 

If you import men from countries which have deeply misogynist, or as we would see them unpleasant attitudes to women, which we can see in Afghanistan, where women aren't allowed to speak outside anymore. If you get a guy from that country and he comes ashore on the Kent coast, he doesn't become Hugh Grant when he gets out of the boat, does he? He still imports those values. And I would say uh women and children in our country are in extreme peril.

Yeah, that's from this uh invasion. Invasion. Do you remember Suella Braverman when she was Home Secretary used the word invasion and all of the usual suspects said, "Well, we don't approve of her choice of language." And you thought that's what we're up against. So, let's allow our women and children to be raped and stalked as long as no one uses the inappropriate language...

The reality is is that the bar is now set so low that anybody from Eritrea or Somalia or Sudan would be at risk. So the logical conclusion is anyone who manages to get here from some of these countries, we couldn't send them back. But ultimately that's clearly a suicidal policy for our country, isn't it? So, I think that that phrase suicidal empathy, whereby we now see the point of view of everyone except our own people, that spells tragedy for our country...

If you want my honest opinion I think they are trying to hide the scale of the problem... The system is working to hide its own failings. That's its main aim. Its main aim is not the safety of the British people. I can't emphasize that enough. This is about deceit. It's an absolute crisis."

Etc. etc. etc.

THEY are at war with us, ladies and gentlemen. The animals at the top of the tree are at war with us. Our politicians are their Colonels and Captains, the immigrants are their foot-soldiers.

If we don't stop them doing what they they're doing then the British people will vanish into the pages of history. It is THAT dramatic. It is THAT real.

Sharpen your pitchforks.

You're Over The Target With Tyler Boyer

Stew Peters: Tweet - 15 November 2025.

"TPUSA SOURCE: 'You’re over the target with Tyler Bowyer.'

Turning Point USA is allegedly involved in the cover-up of Charlie Kirk’s assassination!"

Stew Peters Show: 

"These people are lying, all of them are lying... The longer this drags out, the more these people implicate themselves!"

Only Tucker Carlson and Charlie Kirk petitioned Trump NOT to bomb Iran?

This Tucker Carlson video was uploaded to X/Twitter on 14 November 2025.

"Only two people, me and Charlie Kirk, actually went and spoke directly to the President to make the case that 'NO, you shouldn't get involved in this war because its aim is not actually to deny Iran a nuclear weapon... What this is about is luring the United States into yet another regime change war. and if you do that it's bad for everybody...

Charlie went to the White House and God bless him for doing that. And he was hated, hated! For doing that. HATED for doing that. But he did it!

Very few other people did that. As far as I know, none."

Hated by whom, we wonder?

Actually, we don't wonder, do we?

We don't wonder at all.

Tucker Carlson: The Israel First Meltdown & the America First Movement

They Want You To Kill And Die For Israel

Candace Owens said this on her own podcast - 12 November 2025. 

"I spent all of 2024 having to fight you guys... You lie... you lie like some people breathe...

Everyone knows who these Neocons are who want to keep Americans drummed up. Go to war... They can't fight the wars, but your sons and daughters better fight the wars, guys. God forbid you have a person on a platform telling you, 'no, this is stupid!' We don't need to be involved in Bibi Netanyahu's Middle East BS and expansion policies. Okay? 

They don't have the people. So they want you to be the people that go die for it, and are trying to marry you to those ideas in the classroom, on podcast, via the media. And because their relationship and your trust in media has been fractured. 

They now have to work on trying to fracture your trust in people like me and Tucker Carlson... when he says that obviously no person should send their kids to die in the Middle East, because this has been our policy, our flatline policy, for the last decades and nothing good has come of it. Literally, nothing good has come of it. 

They can't even pretend anything good has come of it. Look around. Look at your streets. Look at your country. Is your country cleaner? Is your country better for having fought Israel's wars for decades?'... 

You all sicken me. I just want to say it again. You all sicken me!"

Is Candace making it up?

Is she hysterical? Is she exaggerating, stark raving bonkers?

Is she an anti-Semite?

No. She's none of the above. She's telling the truth. It's not the truth we're usually spoon-fed, but it IS the truth.

Truth that does not conform to the establishment narrative will almost always be condemned by those who compose the narrative. As will the person who tells it.

Fortunately, we seem to be at a point now where most thinking people are ready to reserve judgment upon much of what the powers-that-be tell us. We are at a point, I think, where most of us, having done a little research, are prepared to take the word of a Candace Owens, over that of the government spokesperson.

And thank the Lord for that.

Clash of Civilisations

Stew Peters: Tweet - 12 November 2025.

"Israel and Jewish-run NGOs are funneling Muslim migrants into the West to ignite a clash of civilizations! Christians and Muslims slaughtering each other and ultimately crumbling western society!"

Stew Peters Show...

"And now that Charlie Kirk is out of the way, Turning Point USA is running right back into the arms of those very same people he was trying to disassociate with. Running right back into heir wallets!"

US Government Admits Chemtrails Are Real (It's worse that you think)

Tucker Carlson interview with Dane Wigington - 11 November 2025.

TUCKER: "I'm quoting from Wikipedia as of this morning. 'The chemtrail conspiracy theory is the erroneous belief that long-lasting condens condensation trails left in the sky by high-flying aircraft are actually quote chemtrails consisting of chemical or biological agents sprayed for nefarious purposes undisclosed to the general public.

Believers in this conspiracy theory say that while normal contrails dissipate relatively quickly, contrails that linger must contain additional substances. Those who subscribe to the theory speculate that the purpose of the chemical release may be solar radiation management, weather modification, psychological manipulation, human population control, biological or chemical warfare, or testing of a biological or chemical agent on the population. And that the trails are causing respiratory illnesses and other health problems.'

So I read that and the purpose, of course, of that paragraph is not to illuminate what this might be, but to attack anyone who speculates about what it might be. It's a form itself of psychological warfare of propaganda. 

And when I read that, I said to myself, there's clearly something going on because the people who control Wikipedia, which would be the intel agencies as we know, um don't want anyone to talk about this... What are these lines in the sky that we have all seen?"

DANE: "There is no theory in this equation. Bottom line is when we have up close film footage of these aircraft at altitude KCT10s, KC135s, C17 Globe Masters with nozzles visible turning dispersions on and off. This is not, quote,  'condensation.' 

Geogwatch.org is the only only entity that has taken a Noah flying lab, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration flying lab, top scientists in it, to sample what these heavy aircraft are emitting at altitude. That sample was processed at rinser polytenic in New York, one of the world's most renowned testing institutions. We found exactly what we knew we would find.

Starting with aluminum nano particles, bioavailable free form aluminum is toxic to all life. Period. That element is named in numerous climate engineering patents as part of a geoengineering dispersion element. So again, there's no theory involved in any of this. 

And what's so incredibly profound in this equation, Tucker, you have the entire global climate science community, governments all over the world saying we need to put aircraft in the air immediately to disperse light scattering particles.

And we use the science terms at geomagingwatch.org, because the chemtrails term is the instant marginalization term by design. You bring that term up, any elected official won't talk to you anymore. Media will immediately marginalize you. Solar radiation management, stratospheric aerosol injection, cloud albido enhancement, climate engineering. If we stick to the science terms, they can't marginalize us. 

So again, this elephant in the sky that we are told is a conspiracy theory is exactly what the entire global climate science community says we need to deploy immediately to slow down the warming of the planet. Stated purpose to deflect some of the sun's incoming thermal energy. We know these programs, not surprisingly, are making a bad situation worse, not better.

And Tucker, they're being used as a form of warfare. And we know that we have countries like Iran constantly demonized. 

Of course, as you well know, immediately after 9/11, we have the list of countries to be targeted, given to General Wesley Clark, a list that clearly existed before 9/11 even occurred. Subsequently, every one of those countries, every one of them endured a once in 1,000-year drought. Statistically, mathematically, that's impossible without climate intervention operations. 

And we have the leader of Iran on the floor of the UN in on film on the record stating NATO was cutting off their precipitation. We have Iranian top scientists recently stating NATO's been doing this for 40 years. Destabilize the food supply by destabilizing the rain and you destabilize the population."